It's climactic, yes, but the abruptness cuts short your time to enjoy finally accessing your ultimate technologies."
1UP ( 80/100) enjoyed the Galactic Conquest mode, but had this to say about single player: " Campaign mode moves at a sort of jerky pace, and everything moves too quickly to really enjoy.GameSpot ( 87/100) was impressed with the Star Wars authenticity and overall presentation: "Logical differences in the optimal playing style between the Empire and Rebellion, as well as an epic presentation befitting of the license, contribute to a fantastic overall package that any strategy-game player can appreciate.".However, Petroglyph has been applauded for presenting the Star Wars universe on a much grander scale than has been seen in any of the franchise's other titles to date, and it's quite possible they simply wanted to make Empire at War as accessible as the Battle for Middle-earth series. Additionally, many reviewers had issues with the game's lack of strategic depth. It was unanimous that the land battles were less interesting than the space conflicts, due in part to repetitive environments on the ground. While most of the gaming press acknowledges Star Wars: Empire at War as superior to its RTS predecessors ( Rebellion, Force Commander, and Galactic Battlegrounds), scores still ranged from 60 to 92. Here's one that's all over the galactic map.
0 kommentar(er)
